News & Insights

We’re Making History in Real Time.

Our timely insights share informed perspectives on the rapidly evolving story of Election Technology, as it unfolds.

Response Letter to POLITICO Article on Critical Election Infrastructure

Below is a letter sent to Tim Starks and Cory Bennett of POLITICO, who cover cyber-security issues.  There seems to be some fundamental misunderstandings of the challenges local election officials (LEOs) face, the process by which the equipment is qualified for deployment (albeit decrepit archaic technology by today's standards), what the vulnerabilities are (and are not), and why a designation of "critical infrastructure" is an important consideration.  We attempt to address some of those points in this response to Tim's otherwise really good coverage....

Read More

Finally, Gov Starts Talking About Critical Democracy Infrastructure

This week the Government started earnest discussions about election infrastructure as possibly rising to the level of critical infrastructure.  Like us, we think they're sensing that this coming general election is ripe for disruption, both from foreign operator but potentially even domestic actors.  We think this is a great idea, but not without the required action to make it really happen.  Designations are start, but there is a bunch of work to be done...

Read More
Commentary Ms. Voting Matters Commentary Ms. Voting Matters

The Awful New Four Letter Word: "Rigged"

Fear, uncertainty, and doubt: the recipe for a disastrous election outcome.  FUD attacks are one of the easiest ways to derail an election.  This is a very tangential surface of the voting infrastructure deterioration problem... a problem the Obama Administration is finally asking us about, and while we cannot say more about that (yet) what we want to mention here is the horribly disturbing comments this morning from one campaign's officials about the likelihood of an illegitimate election this November.  This is not kewl...

Read More
Discussing Voter Participation Innovation at the White House
Announcements, Commentary Ms. Voting Matters Announcements, Commentary Ms. Voting Matters

Discussing Voter Participation Innovation at the White House

Today, our own Meegan Gregg, Director of Citizen Outreach, is participating in a planning workshop in advance of a Civic Initiative Kickoff Summit at the White House scheduled for later this summer.  We are honored to be included in a conversation and planning session where the importance of innovating the ultimate act of voting itself is finally being incorporated into the discussion about innovating civic and voter engagement in general .....

Read More

Fixing Voting Infrastructure: A Good Start to a Great Idea

In April, Representative Henry "Hank" Johnson (GA-04)  introduced a bill in Congress that went largely unnoticed by most.  We noticed.  We prepared comments, feedback, and are now ready to offer more invited input.  At first we were a little dubious because we think the "ask" can be tuned, but then we realized the importance of Rep. Johnson's vision and the potential of this Bill...

Read More
Commentary Ms. Voting Matters Commentary Ms. Voting Matters

Democracy Rebooted; Some of it Left on the Cutting Room Floor

What a day!  The Atlantic Council hosted an executive round table that featured an international group of 30 of the best minds in election administration and technology.  One of our co-founders, Gregory Miller was fortunate to be included in that group of participants.  There was an excellent two-hour discussion that can be seen here.  Read on to learn about our responses.....

Read More

Rebooting Democracy: OSET at the Atlantic Council

On Tuesday morning, we are honored to have our Co-Founder and Chief Development Officer, Gregory Miller participating in an invitation round table discussing this new report published this week by the Atlantic Council, authored by Connie McCormack.  You can watch the web cast of this event here starting at 9:00AM EDT in Washington, D.C. .....

Read More

Announcing Collaboration to Produce Global Election Technology Industry Study

This week the Wharton School together with its Public Policy Institute and the OSET Foundation announced an important industry research project to further inform business, government, and philanthropy on the state of the global election technology industry.  The research team is comprised of two principal investigators: Dr. Lorin Hitt of Wharton and Gregory Miller of the OSET Foundation, leading six Wharton students, and managed by Andrew Coopersmith of the Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative ...

Read More
I Totally Just Voted!
Commentary, Election Information, Risk Ms. Voting Matters Commentary, Election Information, Risk Ms. Voting Matters

I Totally Just Voted!

Ms. Voting Matters here, and I'm going to start spending more time sharing things with our readers here who couldn't care less about code (although it does cause change ;) but who, like myself, really care a bunch more about how we preserve our right to be a part of our democracy.  And for us, that means more easily and conveniently casting our ballot and knowing our ballots are counted as cast, right?  So for you, my thought today is about something that makes total sense on the one hand, and totally doesn't on the other... the voter selfie.  I went back and forth on this for days, reading various views from Vogue to the NY Times, and here is where I come down on this.  I hope you'll think about it, and reach a similar conclusion...

Read More
Commentary, Open Source Gregory Miller Commentary, Open Source Gregory Miller

San Francisco Thinking Forward on Electoral Technology

Last month San Francisco issued a fast-tracked Request For Information ("RFI") to obtain insight, knowledge, and a reality check on the potential for adopting, adapting, and deploying a next generation voting system that is based on open source software technology.  We responded to the RFI. However, in the process, we unintentionally misrepresented the status of OSI review of our OSS license, which we've now corrected.  Read on about our licensing to ensure adoption of OSS election technology, and some comments about San Francisco's thought leadership in researching open source opportunities for electoral technology innovation.

Read More

Hacking Elections: Opportunity Clicking

An emerging media outlet, Who.What.Why posted an article on Monday in their Threats to Democracy section that is totally worth reading.  Seriously.  When people think of election theft, most assume that amounts to somebody doing something to alter how ballots are cast or counted.  Apparently, we should start thinking bigger.

Read More
Commentary, Open Source E. John Sebes Commentary, Open Source E. John Sebes

Repositories Update Continued: VoteStream Dominates

Today we provide another follow-up to our continuing report on our Repositories and source code development efforts.  As others of the Core team have mentioned when contributing posts to the OSET blog (verses the TrustTheVote Project Blog), we appreciate the audience is diversifying over here, and want to forewarn you that parts of what follow get kinda geeky but we try to provide links for those curious to learn more.  (Also Note: The TrustTheVote site is about to be re-launched within the next month, so we're trying to limit blog posts over there.) Anyway, we suspect what makes it geekish more than anything are code-names and acronyms.  We’ll try to minimize the alphabet soup. OK, here we go…

Read More

Absentee Ballot Request, the Horatio Way

Today’s guest-blog is a follow-up to our continuing report on our Repositories and source code development efforts.  And it is from one of our source contributors, a well-respected government I.T. technologist, Waldo Jaquith.  Without further words, Waldo, take it away!

Read More

A Hacked Case For Election Technology

A credible election technology company makes an incredible assertion, and the result is our CTO hot-in-pursuit of some intellectual honesty.  The good news: the conversation is growing on the emerging issue of America's crumbling election technology infrastructure.  The bad news: articles like the one reviewed by our CTO, particularly when published by a respectable online scientific journal create a "reality distortion field" resulting in "sound-bytes" that can mislead policy makers, politicians, and less informed pundits.  Result: degradation of the signal to noise ratio and a hacked case for election technology.  Read on, for a dose of intellectual honesty from our Chief election technologist...

Read More

Reality Check: Cost of Software Development

Even philanthropic efforts to produce public benefits in the form of civic technology have real costs associated with software development.  The open source model, however, means the costs are significantly less than current proprietary commercial alternatives, while the innovative benefits, unconstrained by commercial mandates, can be significantly greater.  More importantly, there is some reality distortion over the real costs to building civic engagement IT, such as election administration and voting systems.  They are markedly different than many other civic engagement tools that require only APIs and interactive web services leveraging government data stores to better engage and serve citizens.  Tuesday's post by Ms. Voting Matters on our Voter Services Portal ignited comments and questions about the real cost to build the Voter Services Portal.  The VSP is not "yet another simple web site," but a collection of software to provide services to voters that integrate with back-end legacy systems, and set the foundation to drive a series of voter service innovations as well as other election management tools in the near future.  We breakdown the cost model and actual costs here...

Read More

Voter Services Portal: Open Source Innovation

The Voter Services Portal component of the Open Source Election Technology Framework is a freely available highly extensible online voter registration platform that can cut the cost of States' and jurisdictions' custom development by as much as 75% and reduce the time to develop and deploy from months or more to merely a few weeks.  Why wouldn't any jurisdiction moving to online voter services strongly consider this freely available source code, open for innovation?  That's the whole point of our non-profit technology R&D effort: increase confidence in elections and their outcomes by offering technology innovations that can be easily adopted, adapted, and deployed.  Sure, there are costs associated with adaptation and deployment; after all, open source does not necessarily mean free source.  But the time and taxpayer dollars savings should make this an easy decision...

Read More